BAGHDAD: An investigation has begun into the deaths and injuries of demonstrators and security forces after clashes in Baghdad on Friday, the Iraqi News Agency (INA) reported, citing Iraq’s Joint Operations Command.
Prime Minister Mustafa al Kadhimi ordered the formation of a committee to investigate following clashes between Iraqi security forces and supporters of parties that are disputing the results of a general election in October.
A Joint Operations Command statement did not mention the number of deaths and injuries.
The statement added that “the negligent will be brought to legal accountability for their negligence and violation of the explicit orders of the commander in chief, which stressed that live bullets should not be fired under any circumstances,” INA reported.
Al Kadhimi also ordered compensation for victims of the clashes and decided to personally supervise the progress of the investigation, INA said.
It was the first significant violent clash between government forces and supporters of the political parties, most of which have armed wings, since those groups lost dozens of parliament seats after the October 10 vote.
Police fired tear gas and live ammunition into the air as scores of the protesters threw stones and tried to advance towards Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone, which houses government buildings and foreign embassies, the security sources said.
Hospital sources said that more than 21 protesters were hurt mostly from smoke inhalation and nine policeman injured from being pelted by stones.
The parties that made the biggest gains in Iraq’s October election include that of populist cleric Moqtada al Sadr, who has called for all remaining Western troops to withdraw from the country.
As per Al Kadhimi’s orders, the investigation committee will include the security of the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), a state-sanctioned umbrella organisation of mostly militias, INA said.
Iraq’s majority sect has dominated government since the US-led overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003.
The election result was seen as a rejection by voters of foreign influence.
The parties disputing the result say there were irregularities in the voting process and vote counting, but have not provided compelling evidence for their claims. – Reuters
